Contributors wanted: support V3 of the pact specification
See original GitHub issueThe README
says you currently support V2 of the spec, please support V3 as well.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:19
- Comments:16 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Pact Open Source Update — August 2022 | Pact Docs
Welcome to the Pact Open Source August 2022 update! ... It supports the V3 Pact specification and V4 Pact specification and provides shared ......
Read more >pact-foundation pact-python - HuBoard
Backlog. pact-verifier fails when running against a service using SSL ... Contributors wanted: support V3 of the pact specification.
Read more >Pact facts — An interactive history lesson | by YOU54F - Medium
This became the pattern that was used for most of the following Pact implementations. Each language implemented a Pact DSL and mock service/ ......
Read more >pact-foundation - Bountysource
However, it says that a number of these matchers are supported in the v3 specification, even though that specification makes no mention of...
Read more >Pact Foundation (@pact_up) / Twitter
Your fave contract testing solution now Pact with more power ⚡ With the #Pact #Plugin Framework, support #contracttesting use cases you previously couldn't, ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
No worries!
For inspiration/ideas, we can look at the implementation guide (for want of a better term) following other language implementations for guidance:
No worries, I didn’t imply it’s gonna be easy. Just wanted to create the ticket, so we can keep track of the progress. I’ve looked into the code and wanted to start working on it, but it is unclear how it should look like in the end, especially when it comes maintaining several supported spec-versions.
So maybe we can use this issue to collect the requirements, use cases etc.