Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
CI: Move linux builds from Azure to Travis?
See original GitHub issueI didn’t check in detail, but I’d say that azure auto-cancel is now working (at least I didn’t see any repeated PR, which the previous days happened frequently). But even with that, azure is significantly delayed compared to travis.
In #22854, I’m moving the docs build from travis to azure (takes more or less the same than a test suite). This will make things even less balanced (making azure be the bottleneck even more).
Not sure if I’m missing something, but would it make sense to move the 3 Linux jobs in azure to travis?
Also, I see in https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/licensing/concurrent-jobs-vsts?view=vsts#microsoft-hosted-cicd the next sentence: Public project: Contact us to get your free tier limits increased.. Does it make sense to check if that’s an option?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:13 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
panda-dev has been updated to have 30 concurrent jobs now. Let us know if that is not sufficient.
Created issue 118111119329971 in Microsoft support, to see if we can get more concurrent jobs.