pandas groupby sum min_count misbehaves
See original GitHub issueCode Sample, a copy-pastable example if possible
d=pd.DataFrame({'col1': [1, 2], 'col2': [3, 4]})
d['col2']=d['col2'].astype(str)
d['col1']=np.nan
d=d.groupby(lambda x:x, axis=1).sum(min_count=1)
Problem description
My hope is that, by using min_count=1, pandas will return NaN when all columns being summed up are NaN. However, now it is returning 0 instead of NaN. Any idea why?
Actual output:
col1 col2
0 0.0 3.0
1 0.0 4.0
Note: We receive a lot of issues on our GitHub tracker, so it is very possible that your issue has been posted before. Please check first before submitting so that we do not have to handle and close duplicates!
Note: Many problems can be resolved by simply upgrading pandas
to the latest version. Before submitting, please check if that solution works for you. If possible, you may want to check if master
addresses this issue, but that is not necessary.
For documentation-related issues, you can check the latest versions of the docs on master
here:
https://pandas-docs.github.io/pandas-docs-travis/
If the issue has not been resolved there, go ahead and file it in the issue tracker.
Expected Output
col1 col2
0 Nan 3.0
1 Nan 4.0
Output of pd.show_versions()
[paste the output of pd.show_versions()
here below this line]
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit: None python: 2.7.15.final.0 python-bits: 64 OS: Darwin OS-release: 18.2.0 machine: x86_64 processor: i386 byteorder: little LC_ALL: None LANG: None LOCALE: None.None
pandas: 0.23.4 pytest: 3.8.2 pip: 10.0.1 setuptools: 39.1.0 Cython: None numpy: 1.15.4 scipy: 1.1.0 pyarrow: None xarray: None IPython: 5.8.0 sphinx: None patsy: 0.5.0 dateutil: 2.7.3 pytz: 2018.5 blosc: None bottleneck: 1.2.1 tables: None numexpr: None feather: None matplotlib: 2.2.3 openpyxl: None xlrd: 1.1.0 xlwt: None xlsxwriter: None lxml: None bs4: 4.6.3 html5lib: 1.0.1 sqlalchemy: None pymysql: None psycopg2: None jinja2: 2.10 s3fs: None fastparquet: None pandas_gbq: None pandas_datareader: None
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:14 (7 by maintainers)
Top GitHub Comments
FYI, I have the same issue. I use groupby to sum data and I want to retain the NaNs if there is no data in a group but have a sum if the group does contain data, even if there are some NaNs. I use this workaround now:
The
min_count
parameter still doesn’t work when used as