Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
TST/CI: PyArrow Test Failures
See original GitHub issueWeird pyarrow failures going on with 37e23d:
https://travis-ci.org/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/276857797 https://travis-ci.org/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/276857799
Looks unrelated to commit, so something probably went wrong with pyarrow
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:15 (15 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Testing — Apache Arrow v10.0.1
If the tests start failing, try to recompile PyArrow or Arrow C++. See note in the Building other Arrow libraries section under the...
Read more >Failed to install pyarrow module by using 'pip3.7 ... - GitHub
Failed to install pyarrow module by using 'pip3.7 install pyarrow' in a docker ... copying pyarrow/tests/test_cuda_numba_interop.py ...
Read more >Python pip install pyarrow error, unable to execute 'cmake'
I was trying to install pyarrow-0.10.0 which failed. But if I'm installing the pyarrow-0.9.0, it works. So I think there might be some ......
Read more >pyarrow 0.12.0 - PyPI
pip install pyarrow ... The code must pass flake8 (available from pip or conda) or it will fail the ... Some tests are...
Read more >Python Development - Unit Testing - GitHub Pages
We are using pytest to develop our unit test suite. After building the project (see below) you can run its unit tests like...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Yeah, so it looks like a feature that was unsupported before is now supported, so this is a good kind of failure
Totally, I’m with you on that. I think allowed failures on the unpinned builds is reasonable