Bluebird.method or any other wrapper as ES6 Class method
See original GitHub issueHello! It’s not straight bluebird issue, but maybe community will help. How to declare ES6 Class method as Bluebird.method or Bluebird.coroutine? 😃
class View {
constructor(options) { ... }
someMethod() { ... }
}
I want someMethod
to be coroutine
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 9 years ago
- Comments:7 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Object method with ES6 / Bluebird promises - Stack Overflow
I am using node v0.11.14-nightly-20140819-pre on Windows with harmony flag. ... serviceMethod of Service object returns a promise. When I use User object...
Read more >Thoughts On Defining Coroutines As Class Methods In Node ...
Here, you can see that we're using Bluebird's coroutine() method to define the doAsync() method on the Prototype of the Thing "class".
Read more >Promise.promisifyAll - Bluebird JS
Class property is a property with a function value that has a non-empty .prototype ... in your application, you could create a wrapper...
Read more >Async-class NPM | npm.io
Wraps static methods whose name ends with Async or are GeneratorFunctions. Any GeneratorFunction is wrapped with bluebird.coroutine(), and others with bluebird.
Read more >Error handling with ES7's async/await - Edward Bramanti
For example, I do not think the addition of ES6 classes was a good ... which we can wrap our async function with...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@benjamingr but the class syntax has no equivalent to annotations now, that’s a disappointing limitation and will mean one has to to keep using prototype syntax in some situations
Yes. Seems we can call yield only from within generator functions: https://github.com/tj/co/issues/148#issuecomment-56975641