Small fixes to the wiki
See original GitHub issueI went through the ‘Using’ page of the wiki and found a few things that may need to be fixed.
- Currently, the example replaces the
foo
string infoo.txt
withbar
, but then saves tofoo.txt.bar.txt
. I think it would make sense to save either tofoo.txt
or tobar.txt
. - The
ex()
method usesin
which is actually a keyword, and thus results in a syntax error. It also refers toself.out_bar()
which has been renamed toself.out_replace()
in the rest of the example.
I can fix this and submit a PR if needed?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Home repair - Wikipedia
Home repair involves the diagnosis and resolution of problems in a home, and is related to home maintenance to avoid such problems. Many...
Read more >Help:Minor edit - Wikipedia
Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that the editor ...
Read more >Small Engine Repair (film) - Wikipedia
Small Engine Repair is a 2021 American black comedy drama film written and directed by John Pollono based on Pollono's play of the...
Read more >Wikipedia:Extended image syntax
This editing guideline documents the syntax used to insert pictures and other media files into Wikipedia pages. The same syntax is used regardless...
Read more >Help:Advanced text formatting - Wikipedia
This essay, Wikipedia:Advanced text formatting or Advanced typesetting, describes many techniques to control (or adjust) the alignment of text on a page.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Many thanks!
Yeah, this is a practice we adopted mainly for documentary purposes, to make it clearer which are the in-ports for the task, and so that it would show up when using auto-completion in the editor, to aid when designing the workflows.