🔨 Implement command options (subcommands)

Feature

Implement subcommands. So that eg the following data gets sent to discord:

{
    "name": "permissions",
    "description": "Get or edit permissions for a user or a role",
    "options": [
        {
            "name": "user",
            "description": "Get or edit permissions for a user",
            "type": 2, // 2 is type SUB_COMMAND_GROUP
            "options": [
                {
                    "name": "get",
                    "description": "Get permissions for a user",
                    "type": 1, // 1 is type SUB_COMMAND
                    "options": [
                        {
                            "name": "user",
                            "description": "The user to get",
                            "type": 6, // 6 is type USER
                            "required": true
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "channel",
                            "description": "The channel permissions to get. If omitted, the guild permissions will be returned",
                            "type": 7, // 7 is type CHANNEL
                            "required": false
                        }
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "name": "edit",
                    "description": "Edit permissions for a user",
                    "type": 1,
                    "options": [
                        {
                            "name": "user",
                            "description": "The user to edit",
                            "type": 6,
                            "required": true
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "channel",
                            "description": "The channel permissions to edit. If omitted, the guild permissions will be edited",
                            "type": 7,
                            "required": false
                        }
                    ]
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "name": "role",
            "description": "Get or edit permissions for a role",
            "type": 2,
            "options": [
                {
                    "name": "get",
                    "description": "Get permissions for a role",
                    "type": 1,
                    "options": [
                        {
                            "name": "role",
                            "description": "The role to get",
                            "type": 8, // 8 is type ROLE
                            "required": true
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "channel",
                            "description": "The channel permissions to get. If omitted, the guild permissions will be returned",
                            "type": 7,
                            "required": false
                        }
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "name": "edit",
                    "description": "Edit permissions for a role",
                    "type": 1,
                    "options": [
                        {
                            "name": "role",
                            "description": "The role to edit",
                            "type": 8,
                            "required": true
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "channel",
                            "description": "The channel permissions to edit. If omitted, the guild permissions will be edited",
                            "type": 7,
                            "required": false
                        }
                    ]
                }
            ]
        }
    ]
}

Code implementation

Open for discussion, please post suggestions on how you’d like to use this in the lib.

Useful link(s)

https://discord.com/developers/docs/interactions/application-commands#application-command-object-application-command-option-structure

[Arthurdw]

@mwath yeah, like I said I’d like to do it through type annotations. (So your Using the function as type hint). Which is a system that could work. But I also quote: I just haven't figured out yet how to do groups properly.

Thanks for the suggestions tho, and its great to see that we’re on the same page. 😊

[Lunarmagpie]

Guess ill go with that method since it seems really maintainable