annotations aren't plotted properly on log axes
See original GitHub issueLooks like annotations don’t show up at the expected coordinates when axes are type: 'log'
example: http://codepen.io/plotly/pen/dOwRyG
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:9 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Matplotlib annotate doesn't work on log scale?
When I plot my data on the regular scale, it works. But then I change at least one of the scales to log...
Read more >I have a code which is definitely correct, but the loglog ...
Learn more about for loop, plot, plotting. ... I have a code which is definitely correct, but the loglog graph wont work properly....
Read more >Violin Plots and Logarithmic Axes - FAQ 2183
When considering a violin plot that has been graphed on a logarithmic Y axis, there are two important issues that must be considered....
Read more >Scatter plots with logarithmic axes...and how to handle ...
This article shows several ways to create a scatter plot with ... However, the log function is properly restricted to positive data, ...
Read more >THE ANNOTATION SCALE IS NOT EQUAL TO THE PLOT ...
p.s. When i am in the layout mode and I try to plot, I dont get this ... your annotative text and dimensions...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Unfortunately. you have to
Math.log
thex
/y
position http://codepen.io/etpinard/pen/oYJwLxYou shouldn’t have to do this, but there’s no way for us to fix this is in a backward compatible way.
I actually suggested adding a value to the
ref
attributes:xref='X'
orxref='x!'
orxref='x_with_transformations'
or something along these lines. Adding a new attribute might be cleaner, though.