Matching axes
See original GitHub issueWe should allow two (or more) axes to not just share a scaling, but actually force precisely equal range
. Use case is plots like this one:
This came up in https://github.com/plotly/plotly.js/issues/272#issuecomment-287043579 but was not addressed in #1522 - opening this as a new issue so we don’t forget about it.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:17
- Comments:13 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Axe Definition - Investopedia
An axe (or "axe to grind") is the interest that a trader shows in buying or selling a security that is typically already...
Read more >Auto Match Dual Axis Scales on Excel Charts ... - YouTube
Get Your Video Workbook Template Here: »» https://cutt.ly/up4v1907S1FD Avoid the classic dual axis chart error! Automatically match both ...
Read more >MATLAB linkaxes - Synchronize limits of multiple axes
linkaxes( ax ) synchronizes the limits of the specified vector of axes. Synchronizing limits allows you to zoom or pan in one plot...
Read more >Graph: auto matching dual "y" axis with different units
Automatically match both axis scales to ensure your chart is always accurate. Dynamically match primary and secondary axis with this great ...
Read more >Make Excel charts primary and secondary axis the same scale
Determine a common axis scale that will handle the 2 data sets · Insert the new series into the chart · Match the...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
if that’s a lot easier, OK, it won’t cause any API problems to enable it later. But I kind of don’t think it’ll be that much harder to do x/y matching since we already have that for scale constraints. And it would be really nice to use with
splom
- it would mean that if you zoom on one off-diagonal subplot, not only would the whole row & column through that subplot zoom but the symmetric row & column would also zoom to match.Only that I didn’t want to allow
scaleanchor
at all when you already havematches
. I guess it may be clearer that way, as it means “range matches AND scale matches”… just seems weird as the only allowed values ofscaleanchor
would be’x’
or nothing.Agreed, that would be meaningless.