New command: get custom action
See original GitHub issueGet details for a specified custom action:
- command
spo customaction get --id <id> --scope|-s [scope] --url|-u <url> - id of the custom action to retrieve
- scope of the custom action. Allowed values Site|Web|All. Default All
- requires connection to a SharePoint site
- url of the site (collection) to retrieve the custom action from
More information available at https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/pnp_powershell/getpnpcustomaction
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
New command: list custom actions · Issue #19 - GitHub
List all custom actions at the given scope. ... Decide which properties should be retrieved. Given that there can be many custom action...
Read more >Custom Action Type 18 - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
A custom action that launches an executable takes a command line, which commonly contains properties that are designated dynamically. If this is ...
Read more >Custom Actions List - Advanced Installer
This custom action calls an executable or a script launched with a command line. The path to the executable file is specified through...
Read more >Calling a PowerShell Custom Action
In the View List under Behavior and Logic, click Custom Actions and Sequences. 2. Right-click the Custom Actions explorer, point to New PowerShell ......
Read more >EXE Custom Action calling cmd.exe - Flexera Community
if u create "new exe" custom action, installshield will launch the shell for u. ... in your case, firstly, u need to create...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

Thanks @waldekmastykarz. Not at all. I was just trying to understand the logic behind, now it makes sense so I will proceed.
Awesome! Good of you to double check 👍