RFC: Move stylelint-prettier to the prettier organization
See original GitHub issueHi folks, I’m opening this here as I’m not sure where else to ask.
I maintain stylelint-prettier which exposes prettier changes a within stylelint
, in the same way that eslint-plugin-prettier
exposes prettier changes within eslint
. I’ve been using this for about two months at work without issue, and I consider it stable and feature-complete (baring one or two possible bugs around processing CSS in custom filetypes).
Given that eslint-plugin-prettier, eslint-config-prettier and stylelint-config-prettier are all part of the prettier organization I was wondering if the prettier team would be interested in having stylelint-prettier be housed under the prettier organization too?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
No results found
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
So I think we can close that issue now.
No, it’s a plugin for stylelint, and their convention is to name plugins
stylelint-THING
.prettier-stylelint
would be a tool that runs prettier then stylelint.This is consistent with how the eslint tooling is named:
eslint-plugin-prettier: A plugin for ESLint (as their conventions say to prefix the package name with eslint-plugin). prettier-eslint: A tool that runs
prettier --write
theneslint --fix
over a file.