Consider allowing to use .yaml instead of .yml as file extension
See original GitHub issueAccording to Wikipedia, the
… official recommended filename extension for YAML files has been
.yaml
since 2006.
Last time I checked, it was not possible to use .yml
as file extension for the configuration file.
GitHub Actions allows to use .yaml
files.
I’m aware that this is probably not a very important issue, and I’m aware that this might cause issues, such as
- what should be done when people provide both
.github/settings.yml
and.github/settings.yaml
but I’m a bit curious - have you considered allowing users to use .yaml
as file extension?
💁♂ For reference, see https://github.com/probot/settings/issues/213.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
What is the difference between .yaml and .yml extension?
You can hold YAML content in files with any extension: .yml , .yaml ... they use a .yml extension instead of the correct...
Read more >So is it .yaml? Or .yml? - DEV Community
I prefer .yml for one simple reason - I grew up in a time when file names were at most eight characters long,...
Read more >Why should we prefer the YAML file over the properties file for ...
In my opinion, the main advantages of YAML files over properties file in Spring Boot projects are the Hierarchical Structure and Popularity ...
Read more >What is YAML? - Red Hat
YAML is a data serialization language that is often used for writing configuration files. ... YAML files use a .yml or .yaml extension....
Read more >Using application.yml vs application.properties in Spring Boot
As well as Java properties files, we can also use YAML-based configuration files in our Spring Boot application. YAML is a convenient format...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
The current API requires the app developer to pass the file name, so it’s up to them. Probot supports both. Often times the app has read access to only one specific file, in which case we couldn’t just support both extensions, we would only have access to one of them.
I’d say we should close this
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.