Disable rules using "off" instead of "false"
See original GitHub issueIn order to make solhint more compatible with eslint, we should allow disabling rules using the value "off"
instead of using false
. We can make this change backward-compatible and, ideally, show a deprecated message for configurations that use false
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Drools disable a rule at runtime - Stack Overflow
This is all working fine, what I'm looking for is a solution for disabling a rule at runtime. The only solution I have...
Read more >Rules of Hooks - React
Only Call Hooks at the Top Level ... Don't call Hooks inside loops, conditions, or nested functions. Instead, always use Hooks at the...
Read more >Best practices for configuring Windows Defender Firewall
Keep default settings; Understand rule precedence for inbound rules ... you can, instead of disabling individual rules, use the shields up ...
Read more >How to Properly Turn Off the Windows Firewall in ... - Dell
To turn off the firewall using Windows PowerShell in Windows Server 2012 or above, including Windows Server Core: Open Windows PowerShell. Type.
Read more >Customizing static analysis - Dart programming language
Disabling individual rules is similar to enabling them, but requires the use of a map rather than a list as the value for...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I meant we could have both options, so that it’s backwards compatible. I think a lot of users coming from eslint are used to using
"off"
instead offalse
(I myself tried to do it).I agree that this is low priority, but it’s the kind of thing that someone looking to collaborate could use as a first issue.
Hi, It’s break backward compatibitilies.
I think it make sense to concentrate on business features instead of this small improvements