Cannot connect event callbacks to MagicFactory
See original GitHub issueAs noticed by @uschmidt83, the @magic_factory decorator is not compatible with the current callback connection approach (widget.param.changed.connect). That’s a big bummer and needs to be fixed ASAP. One possibility would be to allow for MagicFactory to accept a widget_init function, that would be called with the widget instance each time a new one is created…
def init(widget):
widget.x.changed.connect(print)
@magic_factory(init=init)
def func(x: int):
...
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
.net - Understanding events and event handlers in C#
NET and peels away the "magic" - an event is really, under the covers, just a list of methods of the same "shape"....
Read more >The Action args emit wrong handler · Issue #12854 - GitHub
Describe the bug In an Angular component, the Actions display the name of the event handler that is being invoked from the template, ......
Read more >MacOS 12.0.1 Monterey Bluetooth issues - Apple Developer
1 Monterey Bluetooth is broken customer wide. Hence pairing works but our driver cannot connect (code worked for MacOS 10.7 - 11.3). The...
Read more >Custom Event Inquiries | The Magic Factory
Custom, Magical Event Decor + Styling Services! To inquire about pricing and availability of custom event services, leave us your info below!
Read more >Using Hooks — The Pyramid Web Framework v2.0
All response callbacks are called before the NewResponse event is sent. Errors raised by response callbacks are not handled specially. They will ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

That makes sense, thanks for the explanation. But it then probably needs some sort of
initfunction as you suggested in the first post of this issue.yeah, I’m thinking that’s a nice way to keep the functional interface. Will add it soon. Thanks for revealing the need!