Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets?
See original GitHub issueSeveral users (@raj-kesavan, @richardotis, now myself) have wondered about how to concatenate xray Datasets with different variables.
With the current xray.concat, you need to awkwardly create dummy variables filled with NaN in datasets that don’t have them (or drop mismatched variables entirely). Neither of these are great options – concat should have an option (the default?) to take care of this for the user.
This would also be more consistent with pd.concat, which takes a more relaxed approach to matching dataframes with different variables (it does an outer join).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:7 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Yes that is correct
Any plans to support this?