Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Another toml section for testing
See original GitHub issueI’d like to know if there is away to have [test-packages] in Pipfile
It would be good if I have something like
[[source]]
url = "https://pypi.org/simple"
verify_ssl = true
name = "pypi"
[packages]
django = "*"
[dev-packages]
[test-packages]
pytest = "*"
[requires]
python_version = "3.6"
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:25
- Comments:28 (18 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Add package to `project.toml` when needed only for testing?
All dependencies are stored in the project.toml file. Now I am writing a test file to be called by runtests.jl . Only for...
Read more >The pyproject.toml file | Documentation | Poetry
The pyproject.toml file The tool.poetry section of the pyproject.toml file is composed of multiple sections. name The name of the package.
Read more >TOML configuration options - Selenium
Selenium Grid uses TOML format for config files. The config file consists of sections and each section has options and its respective value(s)....
Read more >Python and TOML: New Best Friends - Real Python
TOML plays an essential part in the Python ecosystem. ... Another option is to group your configuration values somehow.
Read more >What is wrong with TOML? - HitchDev
Like most other markup languages TOML has syntax typing - the writer of the ... help you in any way I can -...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
That’s the problem, isn’t it? pipenv is trying to simplify packaging in the Python world and is trying to be a standard. But leaving major use cases behind is kinda what got us to what the state of python packaging is today.
Since there has not been any updates on this. Request the team to look into allowing the option of custom environments for pipenv through Pipfile, since that seems possible in the framework as also suggested by @gsemet . Any updates on the idea?