Support a target directory for vendoring (similar to pip --target)
See original GitHub issueWe currently vendor some of our dependencies to a target directory, using pip install -t
. It would be great for pipenv to support this functionality! This is our main blocker to further use.
I think right now it may be possible to accomplish by having pipenv generate a requirements.txt
and pass it to pip to do the install, but that’s very manual, and loses features like integrity-checking, so it would be much nicer for pipenv to do it.
(I mentioned this at PyCon, just wanted to make a github issue too so I can follow it.)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:15
- Comments:15 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Ansible Pip Install python modules into vendor subdirectory ...
Ansible Pip Install python modules into vendor subdirectory using '--target' - Stack Overflow. Stack Overflow for Teams – Start collaborating ...
Read more >pipenv Documentation - Read the Docs
Pipenv is a tool that aims to bring the best of all packaging worlds (bundler, composer, npm, cargo, yarn, etc.) to the. Python...
Read more >pip install - pip documentation v22.3.1
Description#. Install packages from: PyPI (and other indexes) using requirement specifiers. VCS project urls. Local project directories.
Read more >cargo install - The Cargo Book
If the source is crates.io or --git then by default the crate will be built in a temporary target directory. To avoid this,...
Read more >Using Python's pip to Manage Your Projects' Dependencies
Note: On some Linux (Unix) systems like Ubuntu, pip comes in a separate package called python3-pip , which you need to install with...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Now that there’s new Pipenv momentum, and some of the leadership appears to have changed, is there any way we could reopen this issue? As far as we can tell from the comments here, this was never resolved, and was somehow opaquely moved to a secret tracker.
At the very least, could we track this in public, please?
You can use this as a work around: