Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
[RFC] Use `-rfE` by default? (reportchars)
See original GitHub issueI keep adding this to addopts for projects since it is very useful and nice to have.
Should this be enabled by default?
Unfortunately there is no way to disable this then (would require something like -r= or -r- then, see https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/5066).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:21 (21 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) for Feature Selection in ...
We will evaluate the model using repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation, with three repeats and 10 folds. We will report the mean and ...
Read more >sklearn.feature_selection.RFE
A supervised learning estimator with a fit method that provides information about feature importance (e.g. coef_ , feature_importances_ ). n_features_to_select ...
Read more >Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) - Python - YouTube
Content Description ⭐️In this video, I have explained on how to perform feature selection using RFE for attributes in the dataset.
Read more >Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) by Using Random Forest ...
In this video, we will learn about recursive feature elimination by using tree-based and gradient-based estimators. As its name suggests, ...
Read more >Powerful Feature Selection with Recursive Feature ...
Learn how to use the Sklearn RFE class to implement Recursive Feature ... I provided the default values to cv and scoring parameters....
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I don’t think it would make it “much” worse actually; if you have one or two failures you will see 2 (ok 3 with header) extra lines. If you have 100s of failures you will see a few 100s of extra lines at the end, but I guess in that case you will have 1000s of lines of traceback to scroll, so the extra summary lines will dwarf the amount of scrolling you will need to do anyway.
@nicoddemus I just think that showing skipped (
s) and xfail (x) would be mildly annoying, because it does not indicate a problem, just something intentional the user did, and they will be shown even for successful sessions, which I think are better to keep without a summary.