Feature Request: Docker module
See original GitHub issueIs this possible to add a module, to check if a docker service is up (like the service module would currently do) ?
I would see something like this (with more or less functionalities):
class Docker(name)
is_running
Test if container is running
is_listening
Test if container is listening to ports
version
Return version of the image that the container is running
What do you think about this ? Could it be relevant to add it ?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Exec functionality for docker_compose module · Issue #98 ...
I was using this with a gitlab runner and did not have a collection built into my ansible container. I can just bake...
Read more >Key features and benefits | Docker Documentation
Key features and benefits. Linux User Namespace on all Containers . With Enhanced Container Isolation, all user containers leverage the Linux ...
Read more >Feature Request: Module installation via docker run - Help
Best way to add modules would be via a docker run -e environment variable. Adding two modules could look like this: docker run...
Read more >community.docker.docker_container module
This module is part of the community.docker collection (version 3.3.1). ... Allows to request additional resources, such as GPUs. capabilities.
Read more >example42/docker · Docker module - Puppet Forge
Please use GitHub for any contribution, bug notification or feature request about this module. If you use it, we welcome your rating on...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
please take a look at pull request #300
@blackillzone I think this issue can be closed. The PR mentioned above has been already been accepted and merged.