>>= for bind
See original GitHub issuePython appears to have __irshift__ for >>= which corresponds to the typical (Haskell?) syntax for the monadic bind operator. I think it would be good to use this for .bind?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:14 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Bind Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
1 · to fasten by tying. b. : to hold or restrict by force or obligation. bound by an oath ; 3 ·...
Read more >Bind Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
to become compact or solid; cohere: The eggs and the flour bind, creating a stable cake. to be obligatory: It is a duty...
Read more >123 Synonyms & Antonyms for BIND - Thesaurus.com
Find 123 ways to say BIND, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com, the world's most trusted free thesaurus.
Read more >Bind - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms - Vocabulary.com
The verb bind means to tie, secure, or fasten as with string or rope. When you put a Christmas tree on the top...
Read more >Function.prototype.bind() - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs - Mozilla
The bind() method creates a new function that, when called, has its this keyword set to the provided value, with a given sequence...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

I’m closing this because python’s
>>=is too syntactically inflexible to be useful.bindmakes a parser context sensitive, too. Something to keep in mind, so maybe it’s good to not make it too easy to use bind.