Problems with binary classifier & metrics
See original GitHub issueHi,
I am new to PyTorch and am trying to get started with Ignite. I want to train a simple binary classifier:
class NeuralNet(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_size, num_classes):
super(NeuralNet, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(input_size, hidden_size)
self.relu = nn.ReLU()
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(hidden_size, num_classes)
self.out_act = nn.Sigmoid()
def forward(self, x):
out = self.fc1(x)
out = self.relu(out)
out = self.fc2(out)
out = self.out_act(out)
return out
First I had (plus some events):
trainer = create_supervised_trainer(model, optimizer, nn.BCELoss(), device=device)
evaluator = create_supervised_evaluator(
model, metrics={'precision': Precision(),
'recall': Recall(),
'accuracy': BinaryAccuracy()}, device=device)
This failed with:
~/.local/share/virtualenvs/bot2-Z_RSwUyv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ignite/metrics/precision.py in update(self, output)
29 num_classes = y_pred.size(1)
30 indices = torch.max(y_pred, 1)[1]
---> 31 correct = torch.eq(indices, y)
32 pred_onehot = to_onehot(indices, num_classes)
33 all_positives = pred_onehot.sum(dim=0)
RuntimeError: Expected object of type torch.LongTensor but found type torch.FloatTensor for argument #2 'other'
Then I found the output_transform
parameter and changed it to:
def output_transform(output):
y_pred, y = output
return y_pred.gt(0.5).long(), y.long()
evaluator = create_supervised_evaluator(
model, metrics={'precision': Precision(output_transform=output_transform),
'recall': Recall(output_transform=output_transform),
'accuracy': BinaryAccuracy(output_transform=output_transform)}, device=device)
Even if this worked, I do not think it was a good solution. In my opinion, it should be possible to do the transformation in just one place instead of having to pass it to each metric. Is this somehow possible? Anyway, this fails with:
~/.local/share/virtualenvs/bot2-Z_RSwUyv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ignite/metrics/precision.py in update(self, output)
35 true_positives = torch.zeros_like(all_positives)
36 else:
---> 37 correct_onehot = to_onehot(indices[correct], num_classes)
38 true_positives = correct_onehot.sum(dim=0)
39 if self._all_positives is None:
IndexError: too many indices for tensor of dimension 1
Am I on the right track?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:10 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
24 Evaluation Metrics for Binary Classification (And When to ...
Classification metrics let you assess the performance of machine learning models but there are so many of them, each one has its own...
Read more >The Explanation You Need on Binary Classification Metrics
Performance metrics for binary classification · Accuracy · Precision and recall · F1 score · Log loss · ROC-AUC · Matthews Correlation Coefficient...
Read more >6 Useful Metrics to Evaluate Binary Classification Models
6 Useful Metrics to Evaluate Binary Classification Models · Confusion matrix: the basis of all metrics; Accuracy, precision, recall, F1 Score ...
Read more >What nobody tells you about binary classification metrics
What nobody tells you about binary classification metrics · Accuracy · Precision, Recall, and F1-score (or F-measure) · Negative Predictive Value ( ...
Read more >Evaluation of binary classifiers - Wikipedia
Evaluation of binary classifiers · true positive (TP): A test result that correctly indicates the presence of a condition or characteristic · true...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@anmolsjoshi please go ahead. I think nobody has yet taken this one.
Is someone working on this? Can I help out?