BKSF-Mapper
See original GitHub issueMigrated from Enterprise Github. Creator: @mrossinek
What is the expected behavior?
Implement and test the BravyiKitaevSuperFastMapper
.
This issue breaks-out of #18 and can be used to assign and discuss BKSF-related topics.
- Implementation
- Unittest
- Documentation
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Release Notes - Qiskit
Fix bug in Bravyi-Kitaev Super-Fast (BKSF) Mapper cause by using obsolete method for composing Pauli operators in one kind of fermionic Hamiltonian term....
Read more >qiskit Changelog - PyUp.io
Fix bug in Bravyi-Kitaev Super-Fast (BKSF) Mapper cause by using obsolete method for composing Pauli operators in one kind of fermionic Hamiltonian term....
Read more >qiskit-nature - bytemeta
Support the `BKSF` mapper when using the `HartreeFock` initial state · Cannot import thermodynamic properties · Instance property should be class property.
Read more >Cannot download PDF version of the ebook - Basarat/Typescript-Book
BKSF mapper fails to map H2 operator from driver, 10, 2021-11-22, 2022-08-20. Adding multiply ip addresses to a webspace on create, 1, 2022-01-30 ......
Read more >Reset colors to default after last message - Awslabs/Amazon-Ecs ...
BKSF mapper fails to map H2 operator from driver, 10, 2021-11-22, 2022-08-29. Interested in Options, 10, 2021-06-24, 2022-08-21.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This is related to what John is saying about integrals as input for an operator. Some people have integrals from elsewhere and had been creating the FermionicOperator in the past and are now lost. They don’t start from any driver we have. I fielded another such question today. An operator such as John describes might be helpful for those that prefer to experiment more and are coming at the code from different angles. Of course another way, and its what I refer people too, would be to simply expose the integrals builder function that builds out the FermionicOp from one and two body ints. While its there in the code it does not come out in the published API ref, nor do we have it in any init file where we might want to expose it etc. I know this is not exactly related to BKSF but figured I’d mention since this alterate operator construction was being discussed here anyway - more though in view of BKSF of course.
Closed by #232