Benchmark regressions on master are not being tagged correctly
See original GitHub issueTrying to build master
at commit 98141a02e13b219ee80463ab6b5c94516681304d failed.
More info at: https://travis-ci.com/Qiskit/qiskit-terra/jobs/225005209
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
MINOR: Benchmark regression tests by andygrove ... - GitHub
In an effort to prevent regressions creeping into the planner or optimizer, this PR adds tests for the expected plans for each benchmark...
Read more >Using airspeed velocity - Read the Docs
Benchmarks are run using the asv run subcommand. Let's start by just benchmarking the latest commit on the current master branch of the...
Read more >Tezt: Long Tests and Performance Regression Test Framework
When developing a benchmark depending on the Performance Regression Test framework, it can be useful to test it using development backends so that...
Read more >Automated Performance Regression Detection in the AWS ...
With the benchmark tests, we are now able to detect performance regressions with changes before they are merged into the master. The benchmark...
Read more >PMLB: a large benchmark suite for machine learning ... - NCBI
This initial PMLB repository is not meant to be comprehensive; it includes mainly real-world datasets and excludes regression datasets (i.e. ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
OK it’s merged, now we just need to wait for the next asv release and we can update the CI jobs to run
asv continuous
with the--strict
flag and it’ll have a return code of 2 if the benchmarks fail.It looks like there is already an open issue for it: https://github.com/airspeed-velocity/asv/issues/449
I might give it a try if I get some spare time, it shouldn’t be super hard to fix.
Well we haven’t done a backfill run Qiskit/qiskit#400 has merged the other day, but doesn’t work for any commits after #2414. I was planning to backfill the benchmark data for state tomography this weekend.