Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Remove `cirq.Tolerance`
See original GitHub issueThis class ended up being nothing more than a variation on passing atol arguments, so it’s not pulling enough weight to justify being in the API.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:7 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Transpiler pass to remove gates with negligible effects #8654
This pass would be very useful to ensure that negligible gates are not needlessly applied. In Cirq, whether a gate is negligible is...
Read more >cirq.SingleQubitPauliStringGateOperation - Google Quantum AI
This function removes all classical controls gating the operation. It acts recursively, so that all classical control wrappers are always ...
Read more >Cirq Documentation
Cirq is a software library for writing, manipulating, and optimizing quantum circuits and then running them against.
Read more >how to use the harmonetic® cirq - Sounds of Wonder
more tolerant of the allergen. 5. Keep in mind that using the Cirq is a substitute for the techniques below using the meridian....
Read more >Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with ... - Nature
These experimental demonstrations provide a foundation for building a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer with superconducting qubits.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@vtomole is correct; this would involve completely deleting the class
@vtomole since you have already started, it might be better if I work on another issue. Please let me know if you want me to take over for some reason.