opentracing can not be disabled with runtime config.
See original GitHub issueDescribe the bug
Setting the property -Dquarkus.jaeger.enabled=false
when executing the jar produced by running [my-package]-runner.jar, or via native-image, does not disable jaeger.
Expected behavior jaeger is disabled
Actual behavior The value contained with application.properties is used.
To Reproduce
create a quarkus project
add the opentracing extension
build the executable jar or native image
start with -Dquarkus.jaeger.enabled=false
observe that the tracer is created and proceeds with tracing
Environment (please complete the following information):
- Output of
uname -a
orver
: Darwin USMACEA013SSCOT 18.7.0 Darwin Kernel Version 18.7.0: Tue Aug 20 16:57:14 PDT 2019; root:xnu-4903.271.2~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 - Output of
java -version
: openjdk version “11.0.3” 2019-04-16 OpenJDK Runtime Environment AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.3+7) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.3+7, mixed mode, sharing) - GraalVM version (if different from Java):
- Quarkus version or git rev: 1.0.0.CR1
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:16 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Disable opentracing globally - java - Stack Overflow
Does opentacing/Jaeger expose any config or api or any other mechanism to disable it globally? Which mechanism are you using to enable/disable ......
Read more >Using OpenTracing - Quarkus
By default, when quarkus.datasource.jdbc.tracing is true, tracing is enabled at runtime but you can explicitly disable it by setting the following property:.
Read more >quarkus.jaeger.enabled cannot be changed at runtime
Build time property cannot be changed at runtime: - quarkus.jaeger.enabled was 'false' at build time and is now 'true'.
Read more >Ruby Configuration - Configuring the Instana gem - IBM
The entire gem can be disabled at runtime by setting an environment variable for your application:
Read more >Manual Instrumentation | OpenTelemetry
The SDK configuration must be provided by Applications which should also depend ... If this is not possible for some reason, you can...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Unfortunately it’s going to start being an error to access run time config from a build step (unless it’s just to proxy the object in to a recorder). If you do want to fix it before #5387 is merged, I understand.
We always should have had a strict check for this, however we also wanted to be able to send run time config objects in to recorders so they need to be proxied to do that.
I think we should instead support injecting run time config objects directly into recorders, and then completely disallow usage of run time config objects in build steps. In fact I’ll file an issue to that effect.
Right it only appears to work, it doesn’t actually work. If you change the flag at run time it has no effect. My PR #5387 simply formalizes the existing, actual behavior by marking this property as a build time property.