Retrieval intent needs to store full intent name in tracker
See original GitHub issueDescription of Problem:
The intent ask_faq/python_version is grouped into a single retriever event and placed in the tracker store as ask_faq. If you are using the TwoStageFallbackPolicy and the ActionDefaultAskAffirmation to further contextualize the conversation with the user, lack of the full intent name means you cannot determine the users intent.
Overview of the Solution: Store the full intent name in the tracker store when using retrieval intents.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:12 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Retrieval intent needs to store full intent name in tracker #4826
Overview of the Solution: Store the full intent name in the tracker store when using retrieval intents.
Read more >rasa nlu - Extracting faq sub-intent from a custom action
I get the intent faq… I would like to get a sub-intent like faq/ask_weather or faq/ask_name instead or even ask_weather or ask name....
Read more >rasa.core.actions.action
Extracts retrieval intent from response selector and returns complete action utterance name. Arguments: tracker - Tracker containing past conversation events.
Read more >Common Intents - Android Developers
An intent allows you to start an activity in another app by describing a simple action you'd like to perform (such as "view...
Read more >Actions and parameters | Dialogflow ES - Google Cloud
Required : Check this box if the parameter is required for the intent to be complete. See the Slot filling with required parameters...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

I think that fits super well into “Moving from step 2 to step 3” dialogue as well – first start with handling a bunch of faqs, then see what ones your users have follow-up questions for
ok, I get it now! Yeah it would be great to have a way to find out which faqs should be “promoted” to real intents