Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
[Feature Request] Field Focus
See original GitHub issueA simple way to focus a field.
const { focus } = useForm({ ... })
useEffect(() => { focus('name') }, [])
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Feature Request: Auto focus input field when Window gets ...
I have searched open and closed issues for duplicates Feature Request It would be great to have a focus on the input field...
Read more >7 Useful Tips to Manage Feature Requests - Craft.io
Feature requests can provide product managers with great ideas for product improvement, but they must be managed correctly. Here are our top tips....
Read more >keep focus in first name field after changing contributor type
Feature request : keep focus in first name field after changing ... to) the first name field where it was when I added...
Read more >Next field focus - Feature Requests - Honeycode Community
Hi, On mobile or tablet, in a multi fields form, the focus does not move from field to field after user enter a...
Read more >Loss of Focus (Feature Request) | Tap Forms Organizer
Although focus is removed from the field when you press the return key, it doesn't appear to scroll the content.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Sure! Thanks.
Yes, I can. I just suggested it to have a syntactic sugar. It is not a blocker.