Support `value` customization (aggregate values!)
See original GitHub issueTo quote @skosch:
That’s really neat (and should be documented!), but I still think there’s value in your earlier proposal, since often enough the cells combine data from multiple nested fields, i.e.
${dad.firstName} ${dad.lastName}
, and we’d like to have that searchable too, no?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Summarize or Aggregate Values Using Custom Expressions
To specify a custom expression for a summary value · Specify the groups for your query. · Move to a blank row of...
Read more >Aggregation Configurations
You can create a custom aggregation for any bundle service appointment field. ... Set constant value, Constant Value—Enter True or False, Ignore the...
Read more >Aggregating event field values
A custom aggregate function that you want to use in a query must either be a bounded function or it must support both...
Read more >Aggregate Functions in Tableau
This article introduces aggregate functions and their uses in Tableau. ... For example, you may find that the Sum function returns a value...
Read more >Aggregate Data in a Custom Project Report
You can apply data aggregation functions to the columns in a custom report. Available functions include: Count, Sum, Min, Max, and Average.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
The search case isn’t actually trivial.
Search.search
needs to output unflattened data so the surrounding logic doesn’t break. So it needs to do some sort of lookup while keeping the original shape of the structure intact. I realized this while playing around with the ideas earlier. But that’s just details. 👍I ended up implementing
value
field after all and it works quite beautifully. So I guess it’s safe to close this then. The feature will make it to the next beta (due later today).