Move `rxjs/add/*` modules to a separate package for 6.0?
See original GitHub issueMost of us are in agreement that we’d advise people use the pipeable operators instead of the prototype patching for a variety of reasons that have been outlined elsewhere.
Do we want to keep the rxjs/add/*
modules in the same package as everything else, or do we want to have a separate package to support dot-chaining on NPM?
Or… more extreme… should we eliminate them? Maybe even wait for v 7 for that?
Either way, how could we best educate people of the caveats?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:11 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Importing RxJS 6 in browser? - javascript - Stack Overflow
I can get around it by importing the whole rxjs module and teasing out what I need, like I would using a CDN:...
Read more >RxJS 6.x to 7.x Detailed Change List
This document contains a detailed list of changes between RxJS 6.x and RxJS 7.x, presented in the order they can be found when...
Read more >The RxJS library - Angular
Converting existing code for async operations into observables; Iterating through the values in a stream; Mapping values to different types; Filtering streams ...
Read more >The Best Way To Unsubscribe RxJS Observables In ... - Medium
Different approaches to managing RxJS subscriptions in Angular applications ... Everything was completed, cleaned up and we could move on.
Read more >Complete beginner guide to publishing an Angular library to ...
step 6 - working with the library and the app in watch mode. I always thought as how convenient it is to do...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
This is done. We effectively did this with
rxjs-compat
.yes, I’m sort of agreeing to separate packages, especially given size constraint we’d like to achieve in pkg. Either case it’ll be huge breaking so through guide / migration process should be prepared.