Testing phase estimation
See original GitHub issueWe are doing some sanity checks to see how phase estimation works and we cannot reconcile it with our expectations: the value of the estimation just does not match the correct value. Here’s a minimal working example.
Furthermore, if you change the phase to pi/8
, the phase estimation fails all together, dropping ValueError: The wavefunction is not normalized
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:8 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Software Test Estimation Techniques - Guru99
Test Estimation is a management activity which approximates how long a Task would take to complete. Estimating effort for the test is one...
Read more >Software Test Estimation Techniques (Test Effort Estimation ...
Some of the most important techniques for test estimation are: Test point estimation; Work-phase based estimation; Use case point estimation.
Read more >Estimation Techniques - Testing - Tutorialspoint
Estimation Techniques - Testing ; Review phase, 50% ; Experience-based Testing Estimation Technique. This technique is based on analogies and experts. The ...
Read more >Estimation Techniques in Software Testing [With Examples]
Software testing estimation is a management activity to calculate and approximate time, resources and expenses needed to complete test execution in a ...
Read more >7 Software Test Estimation Techniques | BrowserStack
In this method, once all the different stages of the testing cycle are determined, every stage is assigned or assessed in terms of...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
The representation is as a binary fraction listed from the right. This means that 0001 represents 1/2 0010 represents 1/4 0011 represents 1/4 + 1/2 = 3/4 1000 represents 1/16
Each index to the left is 1/2^i
Does that makes sense @peterwittek ?
Thanks @kmckiern ! This appears to be fixed.