private keywords support (keywords not shown in auto-complete)
See original GitHub issueOriginally submitted to Google Code by froschre… on 24 Jan 2013
Hi,
When creating keywords in Python libraries, internal functions can be marked with _
as the first character. These functions will then not be shown in RIDE’s auto-complete keyword list.
Something similar would be very helpful for internal keywords which are written in ROBOT resource files, so in case the keyword name starts with _
, it should only be shown in auto-complete for usage inside the resource file, but not if an external ROBOT script is being edited using keywords from the resource file.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
private keywords support (keywords not shown in auto- ...
Hi,. When creating keywords in Python libraries, internal functions can be marked with _ as the first character. These functions will then ...
Read more >no python keywords in autocomplete suggestions using ...
Thanks to ekhumoro for guiding me to the answer. The QsciAPIs class has a load method, and PyQt comes with a set of...
Read more >Google Autocomplete: A Complete SEO Guide
Learn how to use Google Autocomplete as part of your keyword and topic research processes for a smarter SEO strategy.
Read more >Use AutoComplete when entering formulas
On the Excel menu, click Preferences. Under Formulas and Lists, click AutoComplete. Select the Show AutoComplete options for functions and named ranges check ......
Read more >Manage Google autocomplete predictions - Android
Important: When Personal results are off, you won't get personalized predictions or recommendations based on your past searches. If you have Web &...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi,
We still interested in this feature
Best regards, Artur
I do not see much value in this proposal. Will wait for up votes on the issue to consider implementing.