Set non-membership and rules excluding certain sorts?
See original GitHub issueIs there a way to pattern match on whether an element E
is definitely not in some set S
? Additionally, if I have a rule: rule V:Val => OP
, is there a way to apply this rule only if Val
is not an instance of, say, KVar
?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Russell's paradox - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Also known as the Russell-Zermelo paradox, the paradox arises within naïve set theory by considering the set of all sets that are not...
Read more >Social Clubs | Internal Revenue Service
Although they are generally exempt from tax, social clubs are subject to tax on their unrelated business income (see below), which includes ...
Read more >26 U.S. Code § 501 - Exemption from tax on corporations ...
An organization described in subsection (c) or (d) or section 401(a) shall be exempt from taxation under this subtitle unless such exemption is...
Read more >What is a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation? | Nolo
California recognizes three types of nonprofit corporations: religious, ... In a nonmembership set-up, the board of directors makes those decisions (such as ...
Read more >Final Rule: Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary ...
certain restrictions in the foreign public funds exclusion to more ... limited set of covered transactions with a covered fund that the ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
You can get the domain of a map by saying
keys(M)
which means technically you can check whether something is in the domain of a map by sayingE in keys(M)
, but this is rather inefficient because it has to construct an entirely new collection. For a simple membership check, we have an explicit function for this:E in_keys(M)
(note the underscore instead of a space)in terms of the second one, you can say
requires notBool isKVar(V)