remove `DeliveryScheme`
See original GitHub issueI’m raising this issue now, since we’re talking about moving the parser
package into its own library, and DeliveryScheme
is part of that package. But the presence of this class throughout the Sangria code has been an annoyance.
Apparently Oleg got the idea from the Parboiled2 project. It was one of his earliest commits, and I suspect that it was a premature design choice. The original idea in Parboiled2 seems to be of dubious value itself.
So my suggestion is that, in the name of simplifying the code, that we return a Try
where needed. This can easily be turned into an Either
or a thrown exception.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Avoid package delivery schemes
The scheme usually asks you to clink a link to verify your personal information or supply payment information through a text or email....
Read more >Delete a scheme - Product Documentation - NetApp
You can delete a scheme that you created from OnCommand Workflow Automation (WFA) if you no longer require it.
Read more >Delhi govt drops name of ration delivery scheme, Centre ...
The Delhi Cabinet headed by chief minister Arvind Kejriwal on Wednesday approved the removal of the name 'Mukhyamantri Ghar Ghar Ration Yojana' ...
Read more >Manage machine catalogs | Citrix Virtual Apps and ...
In other words, the delivery group does not contain machines from the catalog. To delete a catalog: Select Machine Catalogs in the Studio ......
Read more >Remove all duplicates from a list in scheme
Write a SCHEME function remove-duplicates that removes all duplicates from a list. (Hint: you might start by defining a function which ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Code like this isn’t especially clear in the purpose of
scheme
:when all it really means is
It also makes code like this more opaque than need be:
I think you have everything you need already. I’m going to base the next PRs, for #466, on these.