Improving dependencies
See original GitHub issueHey Sara! 👋
- I see this package has
jest
as a (non-dev) dependency. Is this expected? - Could we add
react
as a peer dependency?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
17 Dependency Management Hacks to improve flow efficiency
1. Planning & Scheduling · 2. Program Dependency Board · 3. Visualise Blockers · 4. Reduce Systemic WIP · 5. Monitor and reduce...
Read more >How Visualizations Can Improve Your Dependencies ...
Here's how to optimize dependencies management — anticipating, identifying, and resolving dependencies that keep other projects from getting completed.
Read more >Scaling teams and managing dependencies | by Ronald Doelen
Teams build a dependency board to visualise dependencies. This normally a low tech solution based on brown paper, sticky notes and yarn.
Read more >How dependency mapping can lead to better project outcomes
Here are some key focus areas to help you do that. Practice continuous improvement to reduce the need for dependencies: be proactive about ......
Read more >Agile Teams: Dependency Management and Visualization
Within a single project, dependencies exist. See how to identify, map, and manage dependencies to increase agility and reduce waste inside Agile teams....
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
No, that’s the entire point, it would. Let me clarify my example. This is your current implementation:
https://github.com/SaraVieira/react-social-sharing/blob/be8cb254ba3ee4b151c64c8465e91e3aef7f0b89/src/buttons/factory.js#L23-L31
On line 29 and 30, instead of doing
Share on ${ariaName || name}
, you would do something like:Which would allow a user to have something like:
With the English version of
share_label
being something like “Share that link on {{ serviceName }}” or whatever.Basically, if a function is being given to you, you call it with the service name, otherwise you default to English. Does it make sense?
I am so sorry this completly slipped my notifications 😦
It has been added in https://github.com/SaraVieira/react-social-sharing/releases/tag/v3.0.0