Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
vim :quit
See original GitHub issuesteps
:qor:quit
expectation
It should exit sbt, like we already can in Scala REPL and editors.
notes
:q is not a valid command in sbt 1.1 or 0.13, so there should be no ambiguity.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:13 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Exit (Quit) Linux Vim/Vi editor - phoenixNAP
To save a file in Vim and exit, press Esc > Shift + ZZ; To exit Vim without saving, press Esc > Shift...
Read more >How do I exit Vim? - Stack Overflow
In order to exit Vim, you can exit while you are in either the ex mode or in the command mode. You cannot...
Read more >How To Exit Vim? Multiple Ways To Quit Vim Editor - It's FOSS
Step 1: Enter the command mode by pressing Esc key. Press Esc key: This is very important, because you must exit the edit...
Read more >How to Save & Quit in VIM or VI - OSXDaily
The simplest way to both save and quit out of VI or VIM is with a keyboard shortcut ZZ. Note the capitalization, which...
Read more >How To Exit Vim Text Editor Command - nixCraft
vim : How do I quit from Vi (method #2)? · You can press the Esc key. · Type SHIFT Z Z to...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
That’d be lovely, I even have :q and :wq set up in my shell for convenience rather than “exit” 😃
Personally I don’t get the point. The REPL needs
:to escape commands from being interpreted. SBT doesn’t. (The REPL could do what ammonite does and have scala functions imported that interact with the REPL itself, but it doesn’t.)Are we going to advocate that bash also support
:q?