Support "pragma experimental"
See original GitHub issueThe Solidity 0.4.17 release notes say:
As we are getting closer to the next breaking release, we want to give everyone a heads up by introducing pragma experimental “v0.5.0” which already enables some of the new safety features of the 0.5.0 release.
Currently I get:
There was a problem instrumenting ./coverageEnv/contracts/ProofOfExistence1.sol: SyntaxError: Expected "solidity", comment, end of line, or whitespace but "e" found. Line: 2, Column: 8
Exiting without generating coverage...
Where line 2 is:
pragma experimental "v0.5.0";
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:15 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
This type is only supported in the new experimental ABI ...
Code Generator: New ABI decoder which supports structs and arbitrarily nested arrays and checks input size (activate using pragma experimental ...
Read more >Using pragma experimental ABIEncoderV2 #3410 - GitHub
I am using the experimental support for arrays in ABIEncoderV2. Turns out, if I am not wrong, there is currently no ABI decoder...
Read more >Experimental ABI Encoder - Support - OpenZeppelin Forum
Hi all! I wanted to ask general opinions about using the Experimental ABI Encoder in production apps. I asked on the Discord, ...
Read more >Experimental pragma for EIP-3074? - Solidity Forum
Adding experimental support in the compiler is a different matter though. It depends on how likely it actually is to be added eventually....
Read more >Nim Experimental Features - Nim Programming Language
This document describes features of Nim that are to be considered experimental. Some of these are not covered by the .experimental pragma or...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@area self-assigning and will try to fix parser today unless you’re already working on this. This and #131 also need:
Let’s reopen this as
truffle
4 beta includessolc@0.4.17
update. It’s back to being asolidity-coverage
issue.