RFE: more average_method's for normalized_mutual_info_score
See original GitHub issueDescription
It would be nice if normalized_mutual_info_score
could compute uncertainty coefficient, AKA proficiency.
Implementation
E.g., average_method
can be labels_true
to compute proficiency.
Expected Results
normalized_mutual_info_score(
labels_true=[0,1,0,1],
labels_pred=[0,1,0,2],
average_method='labels_true')
should evaluate to 1.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
sklearn.metrics.normalized_mutual_info_score
Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) is a normalization of the Mutual Information (MI) score to scale the results between 0 (no mutual information) and...
Read more >Which features to use in your model? - Medium
This method basically utilize the mutual information. It calculates mutual information ... The higher score means more dependent variables.
Read more >Mini-Batch Normalized Mutual Information: A Hybrid Feature ...
In this paper, we cluster the data using mini-batch Kmeans clustering and rank them using normalized mutual infor- mation(NMI), a measure to ...
Read more >How to Perform Feature Selection With Numerical Input Data
There are two popular feature selection techniques that can be used for numerical input data and a categorical (class) target variable. They are ......
Read more >Benchmarking Relief-Based Feature Selection Methods for ...
We expect this algorithm to be, by far, the most computationally expensive of those evaluated. RFE ExtraTrees would be more fairly compared to ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@jnothman Shall I take this?
@amueller right, thanks, missed that.