Images min dimensions cause unhandled exception

When I enable in settings.py IMAGES_MIN_HEIGHT = 350 IMAGES_MIN_WIDTH = 350

I start getting unhandled exceptions:

Unhandled error in Deferred: Failure: scrapy.pipelines.images.ImageException: Image too small (62x59 < 350x350)

The exception looks like this:

2017-05-28 19:06:43 [scrapy.pipelines.files] WARNING: File (error): Error processing file from <GET http://example.com/images/0.jpg> referred in <http://www.example.com/>: Image too small (600x200 < 350x350)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scrapy/pipelines/files.py", line 356, in media_downloaded
    checksum = self.file_downloaded(response, request, info)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scrapy/pipelines/images.py", line 98, in file_downloaded
    return self.image_downloaded(response, request, info)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scrapy/pipelines/images.py", line 102, in image_downloaded
    for path, image, buf in self.get_images(response, request, info):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scrapy/pipelines/images.py", line 120, in get_images
    (width, height, self.min_width, self.min_height))
ImageException: Image too small (600x200 < 350x350)

When I comment except statements: https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy/blob/1.3/scrapy/pipelines/files.py#L364 https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy/blob/1.3/scrapy/pipelines/files.py#L372 the exceptions aren’t unhandled anymore.

It seems to me like a bug. Isn’t is? Or am I doing something wrong?

It may be something similar to: https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy/issues/1884 but in my case scrapy really crashes

python-w3lib: 1.17.0-1~exp1 python-scrapy: 1.3.3-1~exp1 both from a debian package Python 2.7.10+

[Gallaecio]

It is not obvious to me, that second issue about two images escaping your size rules. Could you open a separate ticket about that? It would be great if you could include in that ticket a minimal spider to reproduce the issue.

[MihaiWill]

It is not obvious to me, that second issue about two images escaping your size rules. Could you open a separate ticket about that? It would be great if you could include in that ticket a minimal spider to reproduce the issue.

I cannot reproduce anymore, so is fine now,maybe it was a human error from my part. So it works as it should, it just log the traceback. Cheers!