Nested/Partial template support
See original GitHub issueDoes exist any Nested/Partial template
feature in Scriban
?
like includes
in dotLiquid
https://github.com/dotliquid/dotliquid/wiki/DotLiquid-for-Designers#includes
https://github.com/dotliquid/dotliquid/issues/198
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why is partial specialization of a nested class template ...
My guess as to why this happens: complete specializations are no longer "template classes/functions", they are are "real" classes/methods, ...
Read more >Nested templates and partial forms
Unfortunately, Semantic Forms does not support nested templates now, so filling such a template with form is not possible.
Read more >template for nested content
Hi. I am new to Umbraco (and to coding other than html/css, actually) and need help with a template for nested content. What...
Read more >Nested/child HTML in a partial? - support
Hello. Is there a way to create a component-like HTML wrapper in Hugo with children? For example in React you can do <WrapperComponent> ......
Read more >Template deduction for nested classes | P0293R0
This restriction is severe in contexts like partial specialization and conversion function templates where template arguments must be deduced.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@xoofx Can we open this to formally request a better syntax for a layout file?
Perhaps simplify the structure of sfmskywalker’s my-content.liquid to be:
I haven’t seen a better way currently.
I was able to achieve my goal as follows:
my-content.liquid
_layout.liquid
Which outputs:
Although this approach works for me, I’m still wondering if there’s an alternative (recommended) way of doing this?