There is a pattern in which the value of mount object obtained by fsSize() is incorrect.
See original GitHub issueDescribe the bug
For a specific file system name, there is a pattern in which the value of mount
obtained by fsSize()
is incorrect.
To Reproduce
Set the name of the disk to a value with a space such as NO NAME
, and acquire the object with fsSize.
Current Output
Disk Name:NO NAME
mount: "NAME"
Expected behavior I think there was an error in the process of cropping the resulting string obtained by the command.
Environment (please complete the following information):
- systeminformation package version: 5.0.8
- OS: macOS Catalina (ver 10.15.7)
- Hardware: MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2020, Four Thunderbolt 3 ports)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
0506-324 Cannot mount logical volume, There is a request to ...
Problem. Failed to mount logical volume "ex. /dev/datalv" with producing the following error message. mount: 0506-324 Cannot mount ...
Read more >Failure when accessing or mounting storage - Databricks
Problem You are trying to access an existing mount point, or create a new mount point, and it fails with an error message....
Read more >Failure when mounting or accessing Azure Blob storage
When you try to access an already created mount point or create a new mount point, it fails with the error: Console
Read more >Storage Administration Guide Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
This guide provides instructions on how to effectively manage storage devices and file systems on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. It is intended...
Read more >NFS mounting incorrect NFS export | Support - SUSE
There are two NFS exports in the /etc/exports file on the NFS server. Regardless of which export is mounted, only the first export...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@KazukiSugiyama107 fixed … version 5.0.9 just published. Can you test it on your side?
@KazukiSugiyama107 thank you so much for testing