Overhaul type parsers
See original GitHub issuePrerequisite for #6290 @janmeier Can you do this? I think it’s your code
Library support:
- pg: connection-level, reference: https://github.com/brianc/node-postgres/pull/679
- mysql: query-level, reference: https://github.com/mysqljs/mysql#type-casting
- tedious ?
- sqlite ?
The benefit of query-level type parsers are that parse()
can be an instance method of the data type.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
parsers - Go Packages
Package parsers provides an interface for different log parsing engines. Each module in here takes care of a specific log type, ...
Read more >"Parser Parser Combinators for Program Transformation" by ...
Multi-language tool support for syntax transformation is hard due to heterogeneous representations in syntax and abstract syntax trees ...
Read more >CLion 1.1 EAP starts with massive overhaul of the parser ...
Since April we've completed a massive overhaul of our parser to make it more accurate and precise.
Read more >MS RFC 64 - MapServer Expression Parser Overhaul
Overview¶. This is a draft RFC addressing 1) how the Bison/Yacc parser for logical expressions is implemented and 2) where in the MapServer...
Read more >RFR 8192974: overhaul descriptor string parsing
The new parser has a single entry point - namely 'parseLayout', which gives back a Stream<Type>. >>> >>> I've written a big test...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I guess it’s fine as long as we have
options
defined on the prototype. So basically do we agree onFor the postgres parsers I propose we just leave them at the default and then call our parsers on top of it.
nice, if you take these, I will do the custom type parsers.