Specify a path in the bucket
See original GitHub issueHi,
I know I can customize the bucket in which my code is stored with bucketName
parameter. Is there a way to customize the path where the code is store in the bucket? It seems to be stored at the root but I would like it stored in a subfolder.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:6
- Comments:12
Top Results From Across the Web
Solved: How can I specify S3 bucket folders/paths with Put...
Probably yes. A mostly unimportant thing here is that since S3 is really just a key value store the path delimiters are only...
Read more >File paths in Amazon S3 - Media2Cloud - AWS Documentation
Media2Cloud AWS Solution Amazon S3 file paths. ... A web bucket that stores the static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files for the web...
Read more >python 3.x - Connecting to specific path in s3 - Stack Overflow
The error says: The specified bucket does not exist. This is because the s3_cli.Bucket('sub_folder2') wants the name of a Bucket, ...
Read more >Customizing the Amazon S3 Bucket and File Path in SyncS3
You can also set a custom file path for the files. By default, SyncS3 places files into a folder within your bucket that...
Read more >S3 keys are not file paths - alexwlchan
Although an S3 key looks a lot like a file path, they aren't always ... If you look at an S3 bucket, you...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Do you have a link to
basepath
? I can’t find any information about it.Two use cases:
Yes, I think now with CloudFront functions it’s easier to support a prefix path in S3 bucket. As we want to handle the
static
and_next/static
without the overhead of a full Lambda (as it’s not needed since they map directly to S3 paths). I think we should be able to modify the URI to add the prefix to ensure it routes correctly to S3 bucket