Support for S3 tags when using a deployment bucket
See original GitHub issueThis is a Feature Proposal
Description
Configuration should support an option for tagging for deploymentBucket. Example below.
provider:
name: aws
runtime: python2.7
memorySize: 128
timeout: 20
deploymentBucket:
name: mybucket.test
tags:
CostCenter: 1234
Email: myemail@example.com
I would like to attempt the PR for this if admin’s are supportive.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:7 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Tagging and access control policies - AWS Documentation
Example — Bucket operations. Object tags enable fine-grained access control for managing permissions. You can grant conditional permissions based on object tags ......
Read more >Basics of AWS Tags & Terraform with an S3 Bucket
As you can see, AWS tags can be specified on AWS resources by utilizing a tags block within a resource. This is a...
Read more >Serverless Deployment Bucket - Serverless Framework: Plugins
Create and configure the custom Serverless deployment bucket. Purpose. By default, Serverless creates a bucket with a generated name like <service name>- ...
Read more >10 things you should know about using AWS S3 - Sumo Logic
Learn how to optimize Amazon S3 with top tips and best practices. Bucket limits, transfer speeds, storage costs, and more – get answers...
Read more >Tagging S3 bucket objects - TechDocs - Broadcom Inc.
To configure the object scan status tagging · Log on to the Controller Unit instance. · Switch to the super admin user to...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Decided it was better to create resources externally and keep serverless for just managing the function.
I still think this would be a nice addition. 😃