Should we add adult websites?
See original GitHub issueHey guys!
Recently I found out that Sherlock has been used by TraceLabs CTF participators. This means that Sherlock is being used to find missing people, which is awesome!!
This got me thinking, should we add support for adult websites? Because thinking from an investigator’s point of view, I would want to know if my subject who committed an offense, has accounts on adult websites. Why? So that I could know if they might have left some traces there.
My plan is to create another repo, similar to sherlock-data, but specifically for adult websites. The reason why I want to separate the adult websites from the main list of sites is because the last thing I want to happen to you is that you are at work and you use the --browse
option and a bunch of adult websites open up on your work computer.
I do not want to maintain the adult website list because I do not feel comfortable in doing so. So after I create the repo, if any of you guys want to maintain it, feel free to shoot me an email and I will give your write access to the repo which is dedicated to the adult websites.
Let me know what you guys think, I am open to ideas! 😃
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:13 (10 by maintainers)
Top GitHub Comments
@sdushantha Remember that we talked about the general technique of grouping sites of a similar theme in #522. I don’t think that we can add a command line option for every grouping of website: the command line list would explode.
Implementing tags would provide just one command line option to filter the search. For example, if the user wanted to search for a certain name on video sites, then the command would be as follows:
As far as adult sites in Sherlock, I did not think we were going to do that. Or at least, not as a default. Any user can use the
--json
option to pass a JSON file with adult sites in it. If they do that, then no special option or tag is required: the site list would already have nothing but adult sites.It would probably be a good idea to make the
--json
option additive: when the user has one of these options, it adds to the list of sites (instead of replacing them). This would allow people to use the option multiple times to build up a super-list of sites.@Luidiblu That’s a great idea!! In the data.json file we could have a value called “NSFW” and it can have a Boolean value. The command line flag could be
--nsfw