Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Also get WebPageTest HAR result analyzed by the Coach
See original GitHub issueWhen you run browsertime the HAR result gets analyzed by the coach plugin (and others?).
Because I mainly use WebPageTest (which also provides a HAR file) it would be awesome to also have that HAR analyzed.
This doesn’t look very hard when I just listen to the 'webpagetest.har' message in the coach. All data is analyzed and stored correctly at first sight.
What can be a problem is when you would use both browsertime and webpagetest as an input for your run. Both would generate coach results with the same namespace: pagexray.pageSummary (and pagexray.summary but maybe you want to keep this summary over the different inputs types).
Is this a concern?
Possible solution? Start the namespace with the input type? Maybe we should always namespace the metrics with the input plugin? Like: webpagetest.coach.pageSummary or browsertime.coach.pageSummary.
My branch: https://github.com/JeroenVdb/sitespeed.io/commit/cb0748ecb788810f91770596ed6ea0b3f7423171
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
I’m not so into changing the namespace. Since browsertime is default, what about just adding an extra for webpagetest
webpagetest.coach.pageSummary?This is done for PageXray but I think for implementing this for the coach we should also implement getting the doc tests. However I personally don’t feel the need to do this in WPT since we have this in BT.