Pre-compilation of operators, which can't be abstracted over in SQL (take, drop, inSet, ...)
See original GitHub issueSome of our operators do not take Column
arguments but ordinary Scala types, because we cannot abstract over these operation in SQL. Examples are take, drop, inSet. This could be solved by either caching multiple variants of SQL or by doing some sort of textual search-replace in the cached SQL.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 10 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:12 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Set Operators - EXCEPT and INTERSECT (Transact-SQL)
INTERSECT returns distinct rows that are output by both the left and right input queries operator. To combine the result sets of two...
Read more >Abstract - Generate SQL from Perl data structures - MetaCPAN
Takes a reference to a list of "unary operators" to extend the syntax understood by SQL::Abstract. See section "UNARY OPERATORS" for details. insert($table,...
Read more >3 Operators, Functions, Expressions, Conditions
Table 3-1 lists the levels of precedence among SQL operators from high to low. ... You cannot use an empty string for to...
Read more >SQL Keywords Reference - W3Schools
DROP, Deletes a column, constraint, database, index, table, or view ... INSERT INTO SELECT, Copies data from one table into another table.
Read more >SQL Between Operator overview and examples - SQLShack
This article explores the SQL Between operator to get a range of data along with its usage scenarios.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
We’d also love to see this – and this is one of the biggest things holding us back. Any ETA?
Any update on this? It tends to be a really common use case for us (one service will return a set of keys that another service will need to use to do stuff in the DB with), so anything that would let us avoid paying the compile-on-use cost each time would be a big win.