nsp advisory Regular Expression Denial of Service
See original GitHub issueLooks like https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/106 applies to engine.io
I think the solution is to upgrade accepts
:
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:11 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Cisco Regular Expression Processing DoS | Tenable®
On September 19, 2007, Cisco released a security response for a denial of service vulnerability in the regular expression processing in IOS.
Read more >Find Regular Expressions Which Are Vulnerable To ReDoS ...
This can cause denial of service, as the CPU will be stuck trying to match the regex. This tool is designed to: *...
Read more >[MBT-2527] NSP | Major Negotiator Vulnerability - Red Hat Issue ...
NSP | Major Negotiator Vulnerability ... Regular Expression Denial of Service ... Advisory https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/106. Affected Module Tree.
Read more >RegexScalpel: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS ...
Abstract: The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a class of denial of service attacks that exploit vulnerable regular expressions (regexes) whose ......
Read more >Jade npm - Vulnerabilities & Security Analysis - Snyk
The Regular expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) is a type of Denial of Service attack. Regular expressions are incredibly powerful, but they aren't...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
d9dda2b…298cb6f
Why is accepts@1.1.4 still a dependency in engine.io npm registry tarball https://registry.npmjs.org/engine.io/-/engine.io-1.6.11.tgz? Or am I confused about npm dependency handling? See also https://github.com/socketio/socket.io/issues/2591