Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
More permissive license
See original GitHub issueI have imported the spectral package into my code because it works great and is easy to use. It is a processing script of hyperspectral data, which I want to provide as open-source software here on GitHub. I want to provide it with a very permissive license, meaning MIT or BSD-3-Clause. With the GNU GPL2 licensed spectral package as import, this is not possible as far as I see it.
Can you please
a) change the license of spectral to a more permissive license such as MIT or BSD-3-Clause, or
b) give me permission to use your spectral package in my repository?
If not, please let me know. I think this is important information for every user of your package.
Thank you very much in advance!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Dual-licensing is probably overkill here. I don’t see patent protection being a major issue so the MIT license should be fine. Thanks for the quick reply.
@tboggs I’ll try to get to this tomorrow yes. Thanks