Remove the note linking to the download section at the beginning of the example from latex/pdf output
See original GitHub issueFor latex/pdf output, this note at the beginning of the example linking to the download section does not link to anything (since there are no download buttons). Would it be possible to disable it in that case? The straightforward way would be wrap it into a .. only:: html
directive.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Remove 'active contents' from PDF file that was converted ...
I recently rewrote my CV in LaTeX using Overleaf.com. Once I finished writing my CV in LaTeX, I downloaded it as a PDF....
Read more >3.3 PDF document | R Markdown: The Definitive Guide
Within R Markdown documents that generate PDF output, you can use raw LaTeX, and even define LaTeX macros. See Pandoc's documentation on the...
Read more >The very short guide to typesetting with LATEX
Use the toolbar buttons or menu items in your editor to typeset and display the document (you need Acrobat Reader or similar to...
Read more >Pandoc User's Guide
Note that in some output formats (such as HTML, LaTeX, ConTeXt, RTF, OPML, ... See the section Defaults files for more information on...
Read more >Creating high-quality PDF/A documents using LaTeX
Creating high-quality PDF/A documents using LaTeX. This document provides step-by-step instructions for generating valid PDF/A from LaTeX sources.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ahh yeah, that would probably be decent. And actually it’s possible that some existing test will fail without adding that line to some existing expected output string.
Whoops, nope I didn’t. @benvial PR welcome (@banesullivan sorry for the noise)