Add endpoint support for web-specific stack
See original GitHub issueIn spring cloud there are numerous MvcEndpoints that took advantage of the ability of SpringMVC to add arbitrarily complex behaviors to the actuator such as:
- complex POST parameters (maps & objects)
- wrapping a servlet (
/hystrix.stream
), basically access to rawHttpServletRequest
&HttpServletResponse
The benefit of having them in actuator is that they aren’t part of the main application and can be protected by actuator security.
If we move them to normal endpoints we would lose all of the benefits of actuator (global disabled, security, management port, etc…) that are users are used to.
Thoughts?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
AWS CloudFormation endpoints
An endpoint is a URL that's the entry point for a web service. When you work with stacks by using the command line...
Read more >Web on Reactive Stack - Spring
This part of the documentation covers support for reactive stack, web applications built on a Reactive Streams API to run on non-blocking ...
Read more >Spring Boot add my own endpoint as endpoint management
I'm looking for a hint to add my own endpoint to those already defined (NB i don't want to enrich existing endpoint like...
Read more >Management Endpoint Url
Management Endpoint UrlThe DoIT Endpoint Management Service is a free service which allows departmental IT administrators to manage and secure their unit's ...
Read more >Update Your Legacy Stack-Specific ... - Salesforce Help
As part of our ongoing commitment to customer trust and security, integrations into Marketing Cloud are now required to use tenant-specific endpoints. Upd.....
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@snicoll I missed that comment, rather than re-open this one I’ve raised #11703. We can certainly live with the extra meta-data in RC1.
@philwebb the remark in my previous comment has not been fully addressed, specifically:
I’ve just tried with latest
master
and that property is generated. Is that deliberate or is it an oversight?